Aston Villa and Sunderland dramatically outperformed their underlying metrics during the 2025-26 Premier League season, while Wolverhampton Wanderers produced the division's most extreme negative gap between expected and actual points, according to data from Understat.
Villa finished fourth with 65 points despite underlying metrics projecting just 51.07, a positive gap of nearly 14 points. The figures suggest Villa's results were driven by exceptional finishing efficiency, elite goalkeeping, or a combination of both rather than consistent process-driven performance.
Sunderland's debut top-flight campaign produced an equally striking result. The newly promoted side collected 54 points against an xPTS of just 42.03, nearly 12 points above projection, making their seventh-place finish one of the season's most surprising outcomes.
At the other end of the table, Wolves finished with just 20 points despite underlying metrics projecting 35.44, a shortfall of more than 15 points. The gap points to chronic problems converting chances and preventing goals in ways that defied statistical probability. Leeds and Crystal Palace also fell well short of their projections, underperforming by 9.50 and 8.88 points respectively.
Among the top three, Manchester United showed the largest overperformance gap at +6.55, finishing with 71 points against a projection of 64.45. Arsenal's title, by contrast, was the most process-backed of the three, with the smallest overperformance margin among the top sides at +5.13, suggesting their 85-point haul reflected genuine dominance rather than favorable variance.
Chelsea's 10th-place finish represented one of the more damaging underperformances in the division. Their xPTS of 58.85 projected a likely European contender; their actual return of 52 points left them outside the continental places entirely.
2025-26 Premier League: Actual Points vs. xPTS
1. Arsenal: 85 (79.87 xPTS, +5.13)
2. Manchester City: 78 (73.95 xPTS, +4.05)
3. Manchester United: 71 (64.45 xPTS, +6.55)
4. Aston Villa: 65 (51.07 xPTS, +13.93)
5. Liverpool: 60 (61.54 xPTS, -1.54)
6. Bournemouth: 57 (60.33 xPTS, -3.33)
7. Sunderland: 54 (42.03 xPTS, +11.97)
8. Brighton: 53 (55.35 xPTS, -2.35)
9. Brentford: 53 (57.24 xPTS, -4.24)
10. Chelsea: 52 (58.85 xPTS, -6.85)
11. Fulham: 52 (45.08 xPTS, +6.92)
12. Newcastle United: 49 (54.83 xPTS, -5.83)
13. Everton: 49 (46.17 xPTS, +2.83)
14. Leeds United: 47 (56.50 xPTS, -9.50)
15. Crystal Palace: 45 (53.88 xPTS, -8.88)
16. Nottingham Forest: 44 (42.24 xPTS, +1.76)
17. Tottenham: 41 (49.25 xPTS, -8.25)
18. West Ham: 39 (43.49 xPTS, -4.49)
19. Burnley: 22 (24.31 xPTS, -2.31)
20. Wolves: 20 (35.44 xPTS, -15.44)
Wolverhampton Wanderers Wiretap











